<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The search for the perfect skip link</title>
	<link>http://www.communis.co.uk/blog/2005-08-18-the-search-for-the-perfect-skip-link</link>
	<description>Notes from the sharp end of web accessiblity</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  5 Jul 2008 09:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The search for the perfect skip link by: strottrot.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; skip to content-ment</title>
		<link>http://www.communis.co.uk/blog/2005-08-18-the-search-for-the-perfect-skip-link#comment-75</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.communis.co.uk/blog/2005-08-18-the-search-for-the-perfect-skip-link#comment-75</guid>
					<description>[...] I did not realize that content-less anchor tags are &amp;#8220;ignored by JAWS and several other browsers and screenreaders .&amp;#8221; In this article, Communis mentions the difficulty in deciding what to put in the anchor (or rather put the anchor around, like some header). I looked at the W3C&amp;#8217;s XHTML 1.0 specs and found a few interesting things: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] I did not realize that content-less anchor tags are &#8220;ignored by JAWS and several other browsers and screenreaders .&#8221; In this article, Communis mentions the difficulty in deciding what to put in the anchor (or rather put the anchor around, like some header). I looked at the W3C&#8217;s XHTML 1.0 specs and found a few interesting things: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
